Pro
03
2011

Rolling Stones – Love In Vain – ’95

Toshiba Studios, Tokyo, Japan, March 1995

25 Responses to “Rolling Stones – Love In Vain – ’95”

  1. @TheArsenalBoy96 No, it’s Mick Ronson of course

  2. amazing ron wood

  3. 5:22 does Keith play the intro from Ziggy Stardust by David Bowie??

  4. 5:25 -> I looooove you, fu$&en awesome !

  5. never get tired of hearing this…great cover…

  6. Seems atrange that it took a white English band to reintroduce black American music back to the US and overcome the supression and sanitised covers e.g. Pat Boone „tooti fruiti“ (God help us) Great version as a tribute to the great Mr Johnson.

  7. 世界ツアー観るとはっきり判るけど ライブ講演で ぶっちぎりにストーンズも聴衆も乗っているのは アルゼンチンのブエノスアイレス 次 ブラジル その後は イタリア フランス 米国辺りか
    東アジアの日本は大きなマーケットだけど 聴衆の乗りが上海の次に悪い 因みに、rolling stones algentina か bragil italia paris
    america austin ででも検索するとまるで暴徒 最初から乗りに乗っている聴衆 アルゼンチン ブラジルなんて 聴衆は男女 上半身素っ裸だ これって 語学力の無さ と 狩猟民族と農耕民族の差なのか 歌詞の意味が判らず メロディーだけの語学力の差なんだろうな ストーンズも言っている ブエノには脱帽だ まるで聴衆の凄い乗りで サーフィンしているような感じで 演奏も聴衆の凄い乗りに乗っていると。殆どの日本人の語学力の無­さ スラングは PC で Urban Dictionary で検索 放送禁止/ライブ演奏禁止曲が全く無いのも日本だけだろう

  8. Fantastic!!

  9. Fantastic!!

  10. @PENTADACTYLON His name is Mick

  11. @Sointula2 Yes, you read my mind, that’s what I think of this version.

  12. @AndrewP222 Horseshit.

  13. Have to recognize that Ron Wood’s part is good (as a Stones purist)

  14. @asinette
    Naaan pas possible !!!

  15. @fondofrory ,Taylor is great,but Woody¨solo is so cool.

  16. @wichrau That was Sidcup station which is in Bexley, Kent UK !!!

  17. Would be a good song….if Robert Johnson hadn’t written and recorded his 1000 times better version. Sorry Keef, Mick – this just doesn’t do it.

  18. Robert Johnson god rest his soul would have loved to hear his song sung and played with such emotion and passion.

  19. love it!!

  20. Monsters of Sound …..Cool version

  21. @riadlax resonator guitar

  22. Somebody knows what is the instrument played by Ron Wood at 1:30??

  23. Good job, but what is the slide in 1:16? In this tunning, could not touch the G with the other notes (B and E)…

  24. GREAT SOUND !

  25. @Sointula2 Yep, I would be willing to bet that its in open G. Given Richards proclivity for that tuning it would be shocking if it was anything else…but I suppose open D would work for this arrangement as well, but it would be a tad more difficult.

Leave a Reply