Pro
02
2011
PART 1: David Attenborough on Darwin – by Nature Video
British broadcaster Sir David Attenborough presents his views on Charles Darwin, natural selection, and how the Bible has put the natural world in peril in an exclusive interview for Nature Video. To celebrate Darwin’s bicentenary Nature is also providing selected content FREE online, including continuously updated news, research and analysis on Darwin’s life, his science and his legacy. Visit: www.nature.com/darwin
Video Rating: 4 / 5
@azubuikesmith Don’t wish you could: Do it instead
This is why people laugh at creationists… too scared to answer the simplest direct questions while having zero evidence to support their position. Instead of answering questions, they start arguments…
How can anyone trust people like these creationists who are so blatantly dishonest and have no self respect or dignity?
@truthtalker49 4TH time asking this simple question:
If I tell you rocks speak to me, would that convince you that they are alive?
@Rob187ok 3rd time asking this simple yes/no question.
Are you aware of the difference between Evolution and Abiogenesis?
And Chromosome 2?
What about all the „inbetween“ fossils that are missing,, when most should be showing change from one sort of creature to another.
@Rob187ok
Are you aware of the difference between Evolution and Abiogenesis?
And Chromosome 2?
@AllTheseWorldsAreUrs,,, When Darwin came up with his big idea nobody knew how complex a living cell was. Who in this world can prove how a living cell that can reproduce just evolved out of chemicals and stuff? What came just before the first living cell? What was it? An almost living cell? What gave it all the things it needed to turn into a living cell? How could something evolve towards turning into a living cell if it wasn’t living, reproducing itself and evolving in the first place?
@Rob187ok It makes a lot of sense to me… it’s very simple really… it makes perfectly logical sense. I can’t understand why you would say that it makes „no sense“. Maybe you have the worlds worse science teacher… I don’t know, but seriously it can’t take more than maybe an hour to explain it to a kid, so since I don’t think you have a learning disability, you should be able to grasp the concept quickly.
Are you aware of the difference between Evolution and Abiogenesis?
And Chromosome 2?
@truthtalker49 You’re too scared to answer simple questions…
@truthtalker49 3rd time asking this simple question:
If I tell you rocks speak to me. Would that convince you that they are alive?
@AllTheseWorldsAreUrs The victory is Gods, His words in the Bible have never been broken because they hold the truth. No matter how people try, they stumble against them and ruduce themselves to name calling for they have no better fight.
@assym2006 wtf how do you explain money from the tooth fairy and gifts from santa claus!
How can a living, reproducing cell in all it’s amazing complexity just make itself when it wouldn’t be able to live and reproduce if it was any less complex. So what did a living cell evolve from? a dead one that couldn’t evolve? It just makes no sense to think that something as amazing and complex (with all the right bits that do all the right jobs) just made itself,, and then went on to turn into Humans that can say, „wow, we just became the eye’s of the universe so it can knows it exists.
@truthtalker49 It’s great to know you’re desperate to claim a victory. It makes this a lot more interesting. But it also makes me worry you and I are not really in the same league, maybe. But we’ll soon find out.
@truthtalker49 The conversation ended when I asked my questions. You know you avoided answering the questions and decided to preach instead (which is blatantly intellectually dishonest). I guess maybe that’s when the argument began. So you started the argument. I ended the argument you started when I mocked you for being intellectually dishonest. I lost interest in you at that point. And I thought you would be happy to have me gone. But you brought me back. I’m genuinely amused. Great stuff.
@truthtalker49 Hold on… Argument??
I don’t recall „arguing“ with you. I only recall asking you questions. Which you were extremely slow at answering as today’s example show. Do you think just because I ask you questions, that I’m arguing with you?
Questions are argumentative to you are they? hmm
Have decency to be intellectually honest, the courage to answer questions and the humility not to claim victory for absolutely no reason in a non existent argument.
Highly comical.
act two,,,
@truthtalker49 You claim victory yourself? That’s low. But highly comical.
You lost the argument when you avoided my questions: What if I tell you rocks speak to me? Would that convince you that they are alive?
Would you like to have another go? I’ll give you a second chance
@AllTheseWorldsAreUrs I see I have won the argument, you have stooped to name calling and rediculous comments. Thanks for trying. Remember me when your serious about life and death and have another go!
@truthtalker49 I have a rock that tells me it’s name is Jesus. Wanna buy it?
@truthtalker49 Nah. I’ve looked at the Bible, it’s full of shit. Just like you.
@AllTheseWorldsAreUrs „science does not deal in Truths“ – Amen! The Bible does! Read it if you haven’t already and if the words of Jesus speak to you like they do to me then welcome to the truth…. Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” Once you know the truth, you no longer thirst, please give Him a go.
@truthtalker49 Ok so you think that just because you can’t see any evidence that a rock is alive, it does not mean that it’s not alive. What if I tell you rocks speak to me? Would that convince you that they are alive?
@truthtalker49 When I was a kid science was never preached to me, it was like the other subjects, taught to me. Also, since a lot of the science we did in school involved a lot of research and experimentation, we were always aware that science does not deal in Truths, because we were taught that with more research you get a more accurate picture. If science dealt in truths, then why would they build massive expensive machines to try to prove themselves wrong? The words you use are misleading.
@AllTheseWorldsAreUrs True, maybe we haven’t found out yet. This is science after all. Constantly changing and renewing previously wrong assumptions thought and preached to be true to children and adults. My faith in God comes from believing in Jesus and His words in the Bible, not upon thin air and things I can’t see. I need faith to believe but greater is the blindness of people who can see creation and ignore the creator.
@truthtalker49 Ok but just because we can’t see the functions you mention, it does not mean they are not there right?